1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 840 P.2d
  5. 840 P.2d 50 (1992)
 

IN RE DINERMAN

OSB 87-58; SC S37986.

840 P.2d 50 (1992)

314 Or. 308

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of David DINERMAN, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha M. Hicks, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Oregon State Bar, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for Oregon State Bar.

Norman Sepenuk, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for accused.

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Oregon State Bar, charging in two causes of complaint that the accused engaged in conduct that violated standards of professional conduct. The Bar's first cause of complaint charges the accused with violating former DR 1-102(A)(3)1 (now DR 1-102(A)(2)) (illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), former DR 1-102(A)(4...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases