ST. PETER HERALD v. CITY OF ST. PETER

No. C9-91-1675.

481 N.W.2d 405 (1992)

ST. PETER HERALD, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. PETER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted May 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Anfinson, Lake Calhoun Professional, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Grant K. Wacker, Brandt & Wacker, St. Peter, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Acting Judge.

The trial court declared that the notice of claim received by the City of St. Peter qualified as protected nonpublic or confidential data under Minn.Stat. § 13.39, subd. 2. The trial court also denied counsel's request to participate in an in camera review of the document. We agree and affirm.

FACTS

On June 24, 1991, the St. Peter City Council held a closed meeting as permitted by the attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases