STATE v. HOWELL

No. 60655.

833 S.W.2d 49 (1992)

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur HOWELL, Defendant/Appellant.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

August 4, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases