1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 599 So.2d
  5. 599 So.2d 283 (1992)
 

MUNOZ v. STATE

No. 91-871.

599 So.2d 283 (1992)

Luis MUNOZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Avi J. Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on appeal from the appellant's conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1986); Denny v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases