1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 843 S.W.2d
  5. 843 S.W.2d 37 (1992)
 

DORADO v. STATE

No. 403-92.

843 S.W.2d 37 (1992)

John DORADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

December 9, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Rennick, El Paso, for appellant.

Steve W. Simmons, Dist. Atty., David Hilton, Asst. Dist. Atty., El Paso, Robert Huttash, State's Atty. and Jeffrey L. Van Horn, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the Court en banc.

OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

We granted review on two grounds; the one more germane to the error found by the court of appeals reads as follows:

2. Is a harm analysis, pursuant to Tex. R.App.P. 81(b)(2), precluded if an appellate court determines that there has been a violation of the `mandatory' notice requirements contained in Vernon's Ann. C.C.P. Art. 38.072, § 2(b).

State's PDR, at 5.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases