1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 842 S.W.2d
  5. 842 S.W.2d 37 (1992)
 

DR. PEPPER BOTTLING CO. v. FRANTZ

No. 92-133.

842 S.W.2d 37 (1992)

311 Ark. 136

DR. PEPPER BOTTLING CO. OF PARAGOULD, Appellant, v. Don FRANTZ d/b/a Frantz Distributing, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

November 23, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, for appellant.

Casey Jones, Robert McHenry, Conway, Little Rock, for appellee.

HAYS, Justice.

Three points are raised by this appeal: whether a distributorship agreement between appellant Dr. Pepper Co. of Paragould, Inc. (Dr. Pepper) and appellee Don Frantz (Frantz) is subject to the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act; whether Dr. Pepper's termination of the distributorship was without good cause and in violation of statutory provisions; and whether the evidence supports damages of $100,000 awarded to Frantz. Answering those questions in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases