1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 815 F.Supp.
  5. 815 F.Supp. 60 (1992)
 

BRANDEWIEDE v. EMERY WORLDWIDE

Civ. No. 5-90-504 (WWE).

815 F.Supp. 60 (1992)

George C. BRANDEWIEDE v. EMERY WORLDWIDE.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

November 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. Johansen, Scheffler & Johansen, Westport, CT, Frank P. Luberti, Jr., Stamford, CT, for plaintiff.

Carol K. Young, Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin, Stamford, CT, Stephen J. Fearon, Condon & Forsyth, New York City, for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Defendant Emery Worldwide ("Emery"), a Delaware Corporation, brings this motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) on the grounds that plaintiff's contract claim is governed by New York law and, thus, is barred by the New York Statute of Frauds governing oral fee agreements. Emery also contends that plaintiff fails to state a claim

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases