1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 422 S.E.2d
  5. 422 S.E.2d 452 (1992)
 

LAKE DRIVE CORP. v. PORTNER

No. 911SC1121.

422 S.E.2d 452 (1992)

108 N.C. App. 100

LAKE DRIVE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. John A. PORTNER and Erveane Portner, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Twiford, O'Neal & Vincent by Edward A. O'Neal, Elizabeth City, for plaintiff, appellant.

Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland by M.H. Hood Ellis, Elizabeth City, for defendant, appellee, Erveane Massey Portner.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff's only argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to grant plaintiff's motion for a new trial due to the "inconsistent" verdict of the jury. Plaintiff does not contend that the trial court erred in submitting both issues to the jury, nor does it argue that the trial court erred in instructing the jury with regard to either issue or to the requirement that both issues be answered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases