1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 169 Wis.2d
  5. 169 Wis.2d 703 (1992)
 

LIMJOCO v. SCHENCK

No. 91-2658.

169 Wis.2d 703 (1992)

486 N.W.2d 567

Uriel R. LIMJOCO, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey W. SCHENCK, M.D., and Beth A. Schenck, M.D., Defendants-Respondents, Gary W. STEWART, M.D., and Does I-XX, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of William H. Alverson, Michael B. Apfeld and John L. Kirtley of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. of Milwaukee. There was oral argument by William H. Alverson.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Stephen E. Kravit and Brian G. Cahill of Kravit, Gass & Weber, S.C. of Milwaukee. There was oral argument by Stephen E. Kravit.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.

BROWN, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation of the statute granting immunity from liability to those who in good faith participate in peer review of health care providers, sec. 146.37, Stats. We affirm the summary judgment dismissing Dr. Uriel Limjoco's claim against Drs. Jeffrey and Beth Schenck for conspiracy and tortious interference with contract because the Schencks had the good faith belief that they were participating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases