1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 480 N.W.2d
  5. 480 N.W.2d 383 (1992)
 

WADENA IMPLEMENT CO. v. DEERE & CO., INC.

Nos. C5-91-975, C7-91-1402.

480 N.W.2d 383 (1992)

WADENA IMPLEMENT COMPANY, et al., Respondents, v. DEERE & COMPANY, INC., Appellant, Darrell Payne, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Dady, Joseph A. Thomson, Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Louise A. Dovre, Richard J. Nygaard, John M. Bjorkman, Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and PETERSON and FOLEY, JJ.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Deere & Co. challenges (1) the trial court's finding that appellant violated the Minnesota Agricultural Equipment Dealership Act through improper termination of respondents' dealership; (2) the court's grant of a permanent injunction; and (3) the court's award of attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Wadena Implement Company (Wadena Implement) has been a farm equipment dealership for appellant Deere...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases