BATAC v. ASSOCIATED SEC. SPECIALISTS


183 A.D.2d 678 (1992)

Estela Batac, Respondent, v. Associated Security Specialists, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 28, 1992


The rule against successive motions for summary judgment warrants denial of the present motion (Graney Dev. Corp. v Taksen, 62 A.D.2d 1148, 1149). Additionally, in view of the questions that surround the nature and extent of the "standing orders" issued by defendant to its security personnel, and absent evidence by defendant that the security procedures in place were sufficient and adequately performed, defendant has failed to establish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases