The hearing court properly denied defendant's suppression motion under Indictment No. 8172/89. The police officer was justified in reaching to defendant's waistband where he observed a large bulge, since defendant matched the radioed description of a man with a gun, was observed making furtive gestures towards his waist, and he could not explain to the police officers what he was doing in a robbery prone location at 3:00 A.M. Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.