Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, we find that the Supreme Court did not err by failing to charge the jury that the plaintiff had a lesser burden of proof due to retrograde amnesia. Generally, a plaintiff who suffers amnesia as the result of a defendant's act is not held to as high a degree of proof in establishing his right to recover for injury as is a plaintiff who can describe the events (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.