Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims, inter alia, that two brief conversations between a court-appointed interpreter and a witness in open court during a Wade hearing while defense counsel and the defendant were present in the courtroom deprived him of his constitutional right to be present at all material portions of the trial, and further deprived him of his right to counsel and his right of confrontation. We disagree.
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
