1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 607 N.E.2d
  5. 607 N.E.2d 237 (1992)
 

McKAY v. PINKERTON'S INC.

No. 3-92-0275.

607 N.E.2d 237 (1992)

239 Ill. App.3d 509

180 Ill.Dec. 343

James E. McKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINKERTON'S INC., Commonwealth Edison Company, and Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

Rehearing Denied February 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. McKay, pro se.

Robert J. Noe, Bozeman, Neighbour, Patton & Noe, Moline, for Pinkerton's Inc.

Jonathon I. Fieldman, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, for Iowa-Illinois Gas & Elec.

Dennis R. Fox, Califf & Harper, P.C., Moline, for Commonwealth Edison Co.

Justice STOUDER delivered the opinion of the court:

The pro se plaintiff, James E. McKay, appeals from the dismissal of his claim against the defendants, Pinkerton's Inc., Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison), and Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company (Iowa-Illinois). We affirm.

The record shows that the defendant was employed by Pinkerton's as a security guard for a nucleat power plant owned by the other two defendants in this case. The plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases