1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 827 S.W.2d
  5. 827 S.W.2d 12 (1992)
 

EUSTICE v. GRANDY

No. 05-91-00783-CV.

827 S.W.2d 12 (1992)

Scott EUSTICE, Appellant, v. GRANDY'S and Jamila Thomas, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

February 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas B. Arnold, Samuel D. Rosenstein, Dallas, for appellant.

Belinda Vrielink, Rhonda Johnson Byrd, John Kronenberger, Paul B. Van Ness, Dallas, for appellees.

Before BAKER, OVARD and KAPLAN, JJ.

OPINION

KAPLAN, Justice.

Scott Eustice appeals from an order dismissing his lawsuit against Grandy's and Jamila Thomas for want of prosecution. In two points of error, Eustice contends that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reinstate the case. Grandy's asserts a cross-point for delay damages under rule 84 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We overrule Eustice's points of error and Grandy's cross-point and affirm the judgment of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases