KEMP v. FLYGT CORP.

Civ. No. B-89-624 (WWE).

791 F.Supp. 48 (1992)

Harold E. KEMP, Plaintiff, v. FLYGT CORPORATION, a Subsidiary of ITT, U.S.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet Bond Arterton, Garrison, Silbert & Arterton, P.C., New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Mark S. Winslow, Robert M. Fortgang, Robert M. Fortgang Associates, Hartford, Conn., for defendant.


RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

EGINTON, District Judge.

FACTS

Defendant, Flygt Corporation ["Flygt"] moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff Harold Kemp's Second Amended Complaint, along with Kemp's claims for Title VII compensatory and punitive damages and a jury trial.

In 1984 Plaintiff Kemp was hired by Flygt as an Assistant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases