Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Defendant contends that his convictions of burglary in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and petit larceny (see, Penal Law § 155.25) are not supported by legally sufficient evidence. We disagree. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.