1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 259 N.J.
  5. 259 N.J. Super. 578 (1992)
 

DEPT. OF COM. AFF. v. ATRIUM PALACE

259 N.J. Super. 578 (1992)

614 A.2d 1069

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, DIVISION OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE ATRIUM PALACE SYNDICATE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Scalo argued the cause for intervenors-appellants.

William Pagano argued the cause for intervenors-appellants.

Bruce Snyder argued the cause for respondent-appellant Atrium Palace Syndicate (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys, Bruce Snyder on the brief).

Eliaser Chaparro, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for complainant-respondent Department of Community Affairs (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney, Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and Eliaser Chaparro on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, R.S. COHEN and MUIR, Jr.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COHEN, R.S., J.A.D.

The history of the Atrium Palace residential condominium development, the intervenors' contracts, the failure of Atrium Palace Syndicate to complete many of the units it sold, and the enforcement efforts of the buyers and the Department of Community Affairs are all described in our prior opinions. 244 N.J.Super. 329, 582 A.2d 821

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases