STURKIE v. CONSTANCE

1894

309 S.C. 526 (1992)

424 S.E.2d 545

Mary Lou STURKIE, Appellant v. James W. CONSTANCE and Marcia H. Constance, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided November 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K. Douglas Thornton, of The Thornton Law Firm, Georgetown, for appellant.

Phillip Luke Hughes, L. Sidney Connor, IV, and Susan Pardue, Myrtle Beach, for respondents.


Heard Sept. 15, 1992.

Decided Nov. 16, 1992.

SHAW, Judge:

Mary Lou Sturkie brought this action against Mr. and Mrs. Constance for injuries she received from a fall in the Constances' home. Following a jury verdict for the Constances, Mrs. Sturkie appeals. We affirm.

The issues before us on appeal are whether the trial judge erred in refusing Mrs. Sturkie's motion for a jury view of the accident scene and whether he erred in admitting into evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases