1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 797 F.Supp.
  5. 797 F.Supp. 36 (1992)
 

REDMOND v. BIRKEL

Civ. A. No. 88-133 SSH.

797 F.Supp. 36 (1992)

Bertha REDMOND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph A. BIRKEL, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 18, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bertha Redmond, pro se.

T. Clarence Harper, Harper & Williams, Washington, D.C., for L. Redmond, E. Williams, Allsop.

Joseph M. Cahill, Michael S. Levy, Dale A. Cooter, Cooter & Gill, Washington, D.C., for Bailey.

Nelson W. Rupp, Jr., Joel M. Savits, Deborah M. Whelihan, Washington, D.C., for Williams & Huffman.

Richard A. Bishop, O'Brien, Birney & Butler, Washington, D.C., for Ralph & Mary Birkel.

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Now before the Court are the motions for summary judgment by plaintiffs1 Bertha Redmond, Lucy Redmond, Ernestine Williams and Linda Allsop, against defendants Ralph A. and Mary M. Birkel and William J. and Mary C. Bailey. On consideration of the entire record, the Court grants plaintiffs' motions in part, and denies them in part.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases