1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 786 F.Supp.
  5. 786 F.Supp. 46 (1992)
 

DIRECTOR OF OTS v. ERNST & YOUNG

Misc. No. 91-401 (RCL).

786 F.Supp. 46 (1992)

DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, Petitioner, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Respondent.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth J. Guido, Jr., Deputy Chief Counsel, Bryan T. Veis, Donna M. DeSilva, Glynn O'D. Loeb, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Kenneth S. Geller, Evan M. Tager, Micahel A. Vatis, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Kathryn A. Oberly, Daniel M. Gray, Stephen N. Young, Ernst & Young, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This case comes before the court upon a petition by the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") for an order requiring Ernst & Young to show cause why it should not be required to comply with an administrative subpoena duces tecum served upon Ernst & Young, and for an order requiring the production of certain records and documents as set forth in that subpoena. For the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases