CONNORS v. INCOAL INC.

Civ. A. No. 86-3162.

781 F.Supp. 50 (1992)

Joseph P. CONNORS, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INCOAL INC. a/k/a Incoal Coal Co., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 15, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Calvin Golumbic, R. Steven Holt, Erin M. Sweeney, Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

John R. Woodrum, C. Gregory Ruffennach, Smith, Heenan & Althen, Washington, D.C., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. Because there is no genuine issue of material fact and some of the moving parties are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is appropriate. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs' motion is granted in part and denied in part, defendant Kite Coal Sales, Inc.'s motion is denied, and defendant Double A Farms' motion is granted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases