Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The court did not deprive the defendant of her right to a public trial when it closed the courtroom during the undercover police officer's testimony. The court conducted a hearing at which it was revealed that the undercover police officer was still engaged in undercover work in Queens County, that he had cases pending in Queens County, and that closure was necessary for his safety (see, People v Gross,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
