ROGALSKI v. NABERS CADILLAC

Docket No. G011755.

11 Cal.App.4th 816 (1992)

14 Cal. Rptr.2d 286

ROBERT ROGALSKI, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NABERS CADILLAC et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 10, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rudolph & Rohr, William J. Rohr, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Marc J. Poster for Defendants and Appellants.

Mundell, Odlum & Haws, Thomas C. Mundell and James A. Odlum for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

WALLIN, J.

Nabers Cadillac and Richard Nabers (collectively Nabers unless otherwise indicated) appeal a default judgment entered against them in favor of Robert Rogalski for $500,000 in compensatory damages and $58,299.90 in attorney fees and costs. Nabers contends the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to set aside their defaults. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473.)1 We agree and reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases