Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the application is granted, and the proposed notice of claim is deemed served.
Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioner's application for leave to file a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Harris v Dormitory Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.