LINDHOLM v. U.S.

Civ. A. Nos. 92-2044, 92-2136.

808 F.Supp. 7 (1992)

Magnus LINDHOLM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, and the Internal Revenue Service, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 28, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Stephens, U.S. Atty., Margaret M. Earnest, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S.

J. Roger Mentz, Linda E. Carlisle, McClure, Trotter & Mentz, Washington, DC.

Michael Quigley, Lucy W. Plisken, Akin, Gump, Hauer & Feld, Washington, DC.


ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Three motions are before the Court in these matters: defendants' motion for reconsideration, defendants' emergency motion for stay pending appeal, and plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. For the reasons stated herein, all three motions are denied.

First, defendants wish the Court to reconsider its Order of October 8, 1992 (the "October 8 Order"), in which the Court abated in full the jeopardy assessment levied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases