1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 184 A.D.2d
  5. 184 A.D.2d 626 (1992)
 

PRASAD v. B.K. CHEVROLET, INC.

184 A.D.2d 626 (1992)

Sarojini Prasad et al., Respondents, v. B.K. Chevrolet, Inc., Formerly Known as Barnes-Kotler Ford, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 15, 1992

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The record fails to support the defendant's contention that the plaintiffs' expert willfully destroyed or altered the subject vehicle so as to warrant the granting of an order of preclusion as a sanction pursuant to CPLR 3126. During his inspection of the vehicle prior to the commencement of this action, the plaintiffs' expert removed some of the automobile components and stored them in boxes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases