1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 805 F.Supp.
  5. 805 F.Supp. 1 (1992)
 

MURRAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. CA 91-3288.

805 F.Supp. 1 (1992)

Joseph P. MURRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 26, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Achim Kriegsheim, Robert B. Nelson, Alexandria, Va., for plaintiffs.

Charlotte A. Bradley, Ben Blustein, Asst. Corp. Counsel, D.C., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendant District of Columbia's motion to dismiss, defendant Walter B. Ridley's motion to dismiss, and the oppositions and replies thereto. "[A] complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Conley v. Gibson,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases