Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The overwhelming evidence adduced at the suppression hearing indicated that the defendant was subjected to police interrogation only after Miranda warnings had been administered to him. The suppression court was thus correct in denying that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which sought suppression of his oral and written statements (see, People v Prochilo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.