1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 63 Ohio
  5. 63 Ohio St.3d 740 (1992)
 

STATE, EX REL. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 90-1805.

63 Ohio St.3d 740 (1992)

THE STATE, EX REL. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter, for appellee and cross-appellant AT & T Technologies, Inc.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Michael L. Squillace and Gerald H. Waterman, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission.

Per Curiam.

Under former R.C. 4123.57, once a claimant's partial disability was ascertained, the claimant had to choose the method of payment—as permanent partial disability compensation under former R.C. 4123.57(B) or as impaired earning capacity benefits under former R.C. 4123.57(A). Future partial disability compensation was to be paid according to the method selected. However, for "good cause shown," the claimant was able to change his election....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases