1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 64 Wn.
  5. 64 Wn. App. 736 (1992)
 

ARMSTRONG v. BRAY

No. 13296-6-II.

64 Wn. App. 736 (1992)

826 P.2d 706

DAVID H. ARMSTRONG, as Administrator, Respondent, v. ORVAL BRAY, ET AL, Appellants, DIANE SEITZ, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

March 25, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sverre O. Staurset and Lawrence M. Ross, for appellants.

David H. Armstrong, Armstrong & Cable, Frank A. Shiers, and Shiers, Chrey, Hauge, Cox & Caulkins, for respondents.

ALEXANDER, J.

The Estate of Orval Bray appeals a judgment of the Kitsap County Superior Court forfeiting all of the interest in community property that Orval Bray had possessed with his deceased wife. We reverse, holding that Orval Bray did not, by slaying his wife, forfeit his interest in his one-half of their community property.

In 1979, Orval and Mary Lou Bray, husband and wife, executed a statutory community property agreement. See RCW 26.16.120...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases