After informing plaintiff that her employment at defendant Chase Manhattan Bank was being terminated, plaintiff's supervisor, defendant Heineman, allegedly tried to prevent plaintiff from retrieving her personal belongings by assaulting her. The IAS court properly denied Chase's motion for summary judgment, there being a question of fact as to whether Heineman was acting within the scope of her employment (Sims v Bergamo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CULKIN v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
180 A.D.2d 617 (1992)
Candice Culkin, Respondent, v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 27, 1992
February 27, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
