NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. U.S.

Civ. A. Nos. 90-2922 (TPJ), 90-3027 (TPJ) and 90-3044 (TPJ).

788 F.Supp. 4 (1992)

NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Peter G. CRANE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 19, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory James O'Duden, Barbara A. Atkin, Nat. Treasury Employees Union, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs Thomas C. Fishell, Jan Adams Grant and Nat. Treasury Employees Union.

Jeffrey Stuart Gutman, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Federal Programs Branch, Susan Kay Rudy, Mary Ellen Goetten, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., for defendants U.S., Richard Thornburgh, Stephen D. Potts, Charles Fager, Robert Gordon, and Office of Government Ethics.

Lloyd Norton Cutler, Kenneth Paul Stern, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, D.C., for amicus Common Cause.

Mark D. Roth, American Federation of Government Employees, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs David E. Hubler and American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO.

John Vanderstar, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs Peter G. Crane, Richard Deutsch, William H. Feyer, Judith L. Hanna, Dr., George J. Jackson, Dr., Eduard Mark, Dr., Arnold A. Putnam, Seledia Shephard, Robert M. Sivak and Robert N. Spore.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACKSON, District Judge.

In November, 1989, Congress enacted comprehensive multititle legislation known as the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (the "Act"), 5 U.S.C. app. §§ 501 et seq., Pub.L. No. 101-194, 103 Stat. 1760, intended to reinforce standards of integrity within the federal government, both in fact and in the public's perception. Among its manifold provisions the Act undertook to expand the existing restrictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases