Plaintiff Friedlander commenced this action, on behalf of herself in the name of the real estate general partnership, for dissolution and related relief.
By order entered December 6, 1990, the IAS court denied a motion for summary judgment which was predicated on the theory that a certain written communication by plaintiff had effectively dissolved the partnership. Plaintiff timely appealed therefrom. Thereafter, plaintiff, in a cross-motion sought to
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
