1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 63 Wn.
  5. 63 Wn. App. 724 (1992)
 

STATE v. CISNEROS

No. 26111-8-I.

63 Wn. App. 724 (1992)

821 P.2d 1262

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ARTHUR A. CISNEROS, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Mestel and Mestel & Muenster, for appellant.

Seth R. Dawson, Prosecuting Attorney, and John Stansell, Deputy, for respondent.

BAKER, J.

Arthur A. Cisneros appeals his convictions for delivery and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, alleging the trial court erred in (1) refusing to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to an electronic intercept order; and (2) refusing to order an evidentiary hearing to determine whether there were material omissions from the intercept application. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 21, 1988...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases