PER CURIAM.
In this case, Norman Mallard argues that the trial court erred by imposing restitution, over objection, without first determining Mallard's ability to pay, as required by section 775.089(6), Florida Statutes (1991). We agree and reverse Mallard's sentence and remand for resentencing with directions to the trial court to consider Mallard's resources and ability to pay when determining whether to impose restitution. See Denmark v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.