1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 66 Wn.
  5. 66 Wn. App. 715 (1992)
 

GAINES v. PIERCE COUNTY

No. 13163-3-II.

66 Wn. App. 715 (1992)

834 P.2d 631

HERB GAINES, ET AL, Appellants, v. PIERCE COUNTY, Respondent, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

July 31, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Millard J. Sloan, Jr., Assistant, for appellant State.

Robert E. Mack and Smith, Alling, Lane, for appellant Gaines.

Richard C. Robinson and Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc., for respondent Lakeside Industries.

John W. Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel R. Hamilton, Deputy, for respondent Pierce County.

MORGAN, J.

Herb and Rose Ann Gaines appeal the dismissal by summary judgment of their claims against Pierce County and the State of Washington.1 We affirm.

FACTS

The Gaineses own property at the intersection of State Route 161 and 144th Street East in Puyallup. The drainage basin consists of about 400 acres, and the property sits at its low point. Both the intersection and the property have a long history of being flooded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases