1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 608 A.2d
  5. 608 A.2d 161 (1992)
 

WILSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 87-CV-681.

608 A.2d 161 (1992)

Ruth WILSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Shirley Hammond and Ruth Bannister, Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Clarke Baten, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Susan S. McDonald, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, TERRY, Associate Judge, and NEWMAN, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Ruth Wilson contends that the trial court erred in granting appellees' motion to dismiss her complaint. We affirm.

This case involves appellant's complaint for damages and injunctive relief from the District government and its employees for harassment and alleged breaches of the collective bargaining contract between the Board of Education and the Washington Teacher's Union involving appellant's performance evaluations, classroom assignments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases