1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 494 N.W.2d
  5. 494 N.W.2d 261 (1992)
 

ADMIRAL MERCHANTS v. O'CONNOR & HANNAN

No. C1-92-76.

494 N.W.2d 261 (1992)

ADMIRAL MERCHANTS MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., et al., Appellants, v. O'CONNOR & HANNAN, Kirkland & Ellis, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied February 11, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Levine, Peter M. Lancaster, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, for appellants.

James S. Simonson, John M. Nichols, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent O'Connor & Hannan.

John D. French, Elizabeth L. Taylor, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for respondent Kirkland & Ellis.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises directly from a summary judgment granted by the Hennepin County District Court to defendant law firms, O'Connor & Hannan (O & H) and Kirkland & Ellis (K & E), in a legal malpractice action brought by Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. (Admiral Merchants) and Leamington Co. (Leamington).

We believe there are material facts in dispute as to whether or not O & H's and/or K & E's failure to request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases