The testimony at the suppression hearing amply supports the hearing court's finding that the complainant's previous acquaintance with defendant rendered his identification of defendant by a photograph merely confirmatory in nature, and thus not an identification within the meaning of CPL 710.30 (see, People v Tas,
Also amply supported by the record are the hearing court's findings that, at the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.