1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 492 N.W.2d
  5. 492 N.W.2d 258 (1992)
 

WOODBURY PLACE PARTNERS v. WOODBURY

No. C2-92-670.

492 N.W.2d 258 (1992)

WOODBURY PLACE PARTNERS, Respondent, v. CITY OF WOODBURY, Minnesota, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald S. Duffy, William Christopher Penwell, Anthony J. Gleekel, Siegel, Brill, Greupner & Duffy, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Pierre N. Regnier, James G. Golembeck, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, St. Paul, Robert H. Freilich, Richard G. Carlisle, Freilich, Leitner, Carlisle & Shortlidge, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Carla Heyl, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, for amicus curiae League of Minnesota Cities.

Jay M. Heffern, Brian W. Ohm, Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, for amicus curiae Metropolitan Council.

Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, P.J., and LANSING and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The City of Woodbury challenges the trial court's determination that, on its face, an interim moratorium on development effected a taking of property without just compensation. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

This appeal focuses on 505,533 square feet of unimproved land zoned for commercial use in the northwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 494 and Valley Creek Road in Woodbury, Minnesota. Woodbury Place...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases