1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 29 Conn.
  5. 29 Conn. App. 716 (1992)
 

SOUTHINGTON v. PIERCE

(10620)

29 Conn. App. 716 (1992)

TOWN OF SOUTHINGTON ET AL. v. MARY PIERCE ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released December 15, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth John Laska, for the appellants (defendants).

Robert A. Izzo, with whom, on the brief, was Mark Sciota, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

DUPONT, C. J., O'CONNELL and LANDAU, JS.

LANDAU, J.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court's ruling on the plaintiffs' writ1 of injunction was a final judgment for purposes of appeal to this court. We hold that there was no final judgment and dismiss the appeal.

The underlying litigation arose out of efforts by the named plaintiff, the town of Southington (town), to enforce cease and desist orders directed at the defendants, Mary Pierce and Susan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases