1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 307 S.C.
  5. 307 S.C. 436 (1992)
 

HENNING v. KAYE

307 S.C. 436 (1992)

415 S.E.2d 794

Edward L. HENNING and Carol Sue Henning, Respondents v. Herbert KAYE and Max L. Hill Co., Inc., Defendants, of whom Max L. Hill Co., Inc. is Respondent, and Herbert Kaye is Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 11, 1992.

March 11, 1992.

ORDER

Respondents move the Court to dismiss this appeal. By return, appellant opposes the motion as to respondents Edward Henning and Carol Henning (the Hennings). Appellant does not oppose the motion as to respondent Max L. Hill Co., Inc. (Hill). The motion to dismiss as to Hill is granted.

The Hennings move to dismiss pursuant to Rule 231, SCACR. The Hennings claim that appellant's initial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases