1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 180 A.D.2d
  5. 180 A.D.2d 563 (1992)
 

IODICE v. IODICE

180 A.D.2d 563 (1992)

Claudio Iodice, Appellant, v. Frank Iodice, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 25, 1992

The IAS court properly held that the letters exchanged between the parties' attorneys do not evidence a definite, binding agreement settling the action. Particularly persuasive is the fact that the letter written by defendant's counsel clearly stated that it constituted a proposal of settlement, and contemplated that there be further negotiation (see, Brause v Goldman, 10 A.D.2d 328, affd 9 N.Y.2d 620...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases