KNOWLTON CO. v. KNOWLTON

Nos. 91-261 and 91-528.

63 Ohio St.3d 677 (1992)

KNOWLTON COMPANY; MRED PROPERTIES, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KNOWLTON, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arter & Hadden, Danny L. Cvetanovich, Stephen E. Auch and Judith E. Trail, for appellant.

Chester, Hoffman, Willcox & Saxbe, John J. Chester, Donald C. Brey and W. Vincent Rakestraw, for appellee.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Michael G. Long, James B. Cushman and James A. Wilson, for intervening appellant.


SWEENEY, Acting C.J.

While the factual context underlying the cause sub judice is somewhat complex, the determinative issue before this court is easily stated, viz., whether the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas or the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas has jurisdiction over Huffy's attempt to exercise a purchase option of the leased property owned by appellant MRED, successor in interest to the Knowlton Company. For the reasons that follow, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases