ROSARIO v. ELISHIS


186 A.D.2d 548 (1992)

Gladys Rosario, Respondent, v. David Elishis et al., Defendants, and Alan Crystal, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 5, 1992


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, including the stroke allegedly suffered by the plaintiff's attorney after service by the appellant of a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, we cannot say that the Supreme Court was required to dismiss the complaint unconditionally (see, Capichiano v Montefiore Hosp., 118 A.D.2d 676

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases