RAMOS v. SILENT HOIST AND CRANE CO.


256 N.J. Super. 467 (1992)

607 A.2d 667

CARLOS RAMOS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. SILENT HOIST AND CRANE CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh M. Turk argued the cause for appellant (Sullivan & Liapakis, attorneys; Hugh Turk on the brief).

Andrew Carlowicz, argued the cause for respondent Foremost Electric (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys; James B. Moran, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, GRUCCIO and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from an interlocutory order determining that defendant Foremost Electro-Service Co. was neither a manufacturer nor seller within the meaning of the 1987 Product Liability Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-1 et seq., and that plaintiff's claim against Foremost could only be founded on the theory of negligence to which a defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases