The City's motion for summary judgment was properly granted since plaintiff ignored the contract's provisions (i) for notification to the City that work being directed by the City as contract work was, in plaintiff's view, extra work entitling it to additional compensation and (ii) for failure to document the cost of this disputed work with contemporaneous records showing the labor and material costs attributable thereto (Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
A.I. SMITH ELEC. CONTRACTORS, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK (MJ-325)
181 A.D.2d 542 (1992)
A.I. Smith Electrical Contractors, Inc., Appellant, v. City of New York (MJ-325), Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 19, 1992
March 19, 1992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
