DIGITAL & ANALOG DESIGN CORP. v. NORTH SUPPLY CO.

No. 91-128.

63 Ohio St.3d 657 (1992)

DIGITAL & ANALOG DESIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. NORTH SUPPLY COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wickens, Herzer & Panza, A L.P.A., Richard D. Panza, William F. Kolis, Jr., and Matthew W. Nakon, for appellee.

Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, John B. Robertson and Robert H. Eddy, for appellant.


WRIGHT, J.

Appellant's propositions of law raise essentially two issues for our review: (1) whether, and under what situations, it is proper to award prejudgment interest, pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C), if the plaintiff has been awarded punitive damages; and (2) whether a litigant in a tort action is entitled to have a jury determine whether, or in what amount, attorney fees should be awarded. We address each of these issues in turn.

I

R.C. 1343.03...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases